Legal Opinion
Ayasli v. Armstrong
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided December 18, 2002No. 99-P-274PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendants own adjacent waterfront property in Falmouth. The one thing on which they agree is that the defendants, Richard and Patricia Armstrong, opposed proposed renovations to the plaintiffs’ house. The plaintiffs, Serpil and Yalcin Ayasli, claim that the defendants “engag[ed] in . . . behaviors which were calculated to harass, intimidate, and coerce [them] into abandoning the [renovation,” thus interfering with the Ayaslis’ right to use and improve their property, in violation of the State Civil Rights Act, G. L. c. 12, §§ 11H, 111. The defendants claim that they…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Bally v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Bell v. MazzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Batchelder v. Allied Stores Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Meuser v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Haufler v. ZotosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- Kennie v. Natural Resource DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Snyder v. ColluraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.