Hodges v. Sasil Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
915 A.2d 1 (2007)
189 N.J. 210
Rochelle HODGES and Renita Hodges, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
SASIL CORPORATION, Sotnas Garden Apartments Corporation, Rosalie C. Scheckel, Esq., 100 Chadwick Avenue, L.L.C. and Alfonso Santos, Defendants, and
Feinstein, Raiss, Kelin & Booker, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued September 25, 2006.
Decided January 31, 2007.
Gary D. Gordon, West Orange, argued the cause for appellant (Feinstein, Raiss, Kelin & Booker, attorneys; Mr. Gordon and Tracey Goldstein, on the briefs).
César E. Torres, Newark, argued the cause for respondents (Edna Y.…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Zazzali; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hawthorne v. Mac Adjustment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.