Legal Opinion

Moynihan Associates, Inc. v. Hanisch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1972No. 185PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

In our view the controlling issue is whether Haniseh had an enforceable common-law lien.

Moynihan, through his counsel, takes the position that Haniseh does not have an enforceable lien because the services he rendered do not come within any statutory description of a lien. He further contends that common-law liens have been abrogated by the legislative enactment of our several lien statutes, particularly ch. 289. We disagree. Sec. 289.48 of the lien chapter of the statutes sets forth the procedure for the enforcement of liens. Within this section it is expressly provided that every person…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. IsaacsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Arians v. BrickleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ilsley v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Byrnes v. MetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. West Allis Industrial Loan Co. v. StarkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Lindberg Corporation, D/B/A Harris MetalsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Matter of HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Peth v. BreitzmannDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Quad/Graphics, Inc. v. R. L. Newport & Co. (In Re R. L. Newport & Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. Opinion No. Oag 16-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API