Farmer City State Bank v. Champaign National Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trapp
The defendants appeal a deficiency decree entered in favor of the plaintiff, Farmer City State Bank, resulting from the foreclosure and sale of defendants’ property. On appeal, the defendants argue that the trial court erred in entering the deficiency judgment against them because (1) the allegations of the complaint for foreclosure do not sustain the entry of the deficiency decrees; (2) the defendants are guarantors; and (3) defendant John Henry failed to receive actual notice of the foreclosure sale. Alternatively, the defendants argue that the trial court erred in determining the amount…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skolnik v. PetellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
- Cotes v. BennettIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Conerty v. RichtsteigIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Dorn v. GeuderIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Emerson v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Willoughby v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- LP XXVI, LLC v. GoldsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- First Midwest Bank v. CoboIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- Coppock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.