Legal Opinion

Martin Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1961No. Appeal, No. 289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and board denied benefits to the claimant under §402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (1). The claimant had been employed by I. T. E. Circuit Breaker Company for ten years as a mechanical inspector. On August 18, 1960, he was offered a janitorial job in another unit of the employer’s plant at the hourly rate of $1.68, which was forty-six cents an hour less than his former job. He refused the transfer and voluntarily terminated his employment because he would not accept the decrease in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Buletza Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armco Steel Corp. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Handy Markets, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Kochansky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API