Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Beaver City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1972No. 12524PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Ronald Bradshaw and others as taxpayers and residents within Beaver City, Utah, seek to enjoin the annexation of a tract of about 21 acres of land “immediately north” of the city limits belonging to the defendant Interstate Development Company. Their contention is that the annexation is arbitrary, unreasonable, capricious and not done in accordance with law and the prerogatives of the defendant City Council. 1 On the basis of the pleadings and affidavits which set forth the facts as claimed by the respective parties, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dupler v. YatesUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Application of PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. In Re the Disconnection of Part of the Territory of the Town of West Jordan, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kearns-Tribune Corp. v. Salt Lake County CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Child v. City of Spanish ForkUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Doenges v. City of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Freeman v. Centerville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Freeman v. Centerville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API