Legal Opinion
Bishop v. Committee On Professional Ethics & Conduct of Iowa State Bar Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1982No. Nos. 81-2020, 81-2021 and 82-1012PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, Circuit Judge.
Background
On January 22, 1981, the appellant, Gary T. Bishop, filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) and 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (1976) challenging the constitutionality of the Disciplinary Rules of the Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility limiting the means and content of lawyer advertising. Bishop, a licensed attorney practicing law in Iowa at the time the action was filed, alleged that he wished to use means of advertising and advertising content that were prohibited by the Iowa Disciplinary Rules but which were within the scope of the first amendment’s protection…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, Gary T. Bishop v. Committee on Professional Ethics and Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Association and Its Chairman, James E. Cooney, in His Official Capacity, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Libertarian Party of Arkansas v. Mark MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Robinson v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2000
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. New Prime, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002
- Evans v. American Credit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.