Legal Opinion

In re Sauer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 13, 1922No. 3PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by Amanda Appell Evans, as executrix, from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of New York, entered in the office of the clerk of said Surrogate’s Court on the 7th day of August, 1920, directing a distribution of a surplus income of the estate of Jacob Appell, deceased, and also from an order .entered in said clerk’s office on the 22d day of April, 1918, appointing a referee to take evidence and report.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

While the proceedings for an accounting and to remove one of the executors (See Matter of Appell, Nos. 1, 2, 199 App. Div. 574, 580), and an action by the widow for an admeasurement of her dower, were pending and undetermined, four of the children of Jacob Appell instituted this proceeding, which was referred to the same referee to whom the other proceeding had been referred, and such proceedings were had that an order for distribution of a certain amount was directed to be made to the four petitioners.

The petitioners claim that they were entitled to maintain this proceeding by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Appell v. AppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Appell v. . AppellNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. In re AppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. AppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API