Legal Opinion

Graham v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 29, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 89 — Actions by Gbaiiam against Graham and Edwards against Loy on Motion to Docket and Advance and for Oral Argument. APPEAL from green circuit court. Motions to Docket and for Oral Argument Sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

CHIEF JUSTICE GUFFY,

sustaining motions TO ADVANCE AND FOR ORAL ARGUMENT.

The appellants in each of the above cases have entered motions to have the cases docketed and advanced and set for oral argument, which motions are objected to by the appellees. The question presented for decision is whether, under the act of- the General Assembly passed in 1900, the appellants are entitled to have these cases docketed and advanced for decision, although the transcripts were not filed twenty days before the present term of this court. If will be seen from an examination of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ChelfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Erwin v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Clark v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API