Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Berg

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1930No. 22325. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, Fisher, brought this action against the appellants, Berg,'to recover on an assigned claim incurred for designing, constructing and installing a machine intended for use in splitting wooden blocks into suitable sizes for the manufacture of wood pulp. There was a trial by the court sitting with a jury, in which a verdict was returned in favor of the respondent for the sum of $2,800. A judgment was entered^ on the verdict, and it is from this judgment that the appeal before us is prosecuted.

The appellants make a number of assignments of error, but, as many of them raise the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bleecker v. Satsop RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. King v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mellgren Plumbing Shop v. Lewis and Tinsley, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Mellgren Plumbing Shop v. Lewis and Tinsley, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API