Legal Opinion
In re G & G Appliance Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 19, 1961No. 28675PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This case is before the court on a petition by the debtor for a review of an order of the referee that a surplus of deposit remaining in the hands of. the distributor after a confirmed arrangement was fully consummated should be paid to the attorney for the debtor on account •of a compensatory allowance for his services to the debtor from the date he was .•authorized to be retained until the date the arrangement was confirmed.
In his application for allowance respondent Sid Miller, the attorney for the ■debtor, recited that he waived his right to inclusion of funds…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Biggs v. MaysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- In re FrischknechtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- In re AlbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- In re Kalnitzsky Bros. & OppenheimDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- In the Matter of Harry Smith MacHine Company, a California Corporation, Debtor, Samuel A. Miller and Mason & WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. G & G Appliance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- In Re G & G Appliance Company. Sid M. Miller v. The G & G Appliance Co., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962