Legal Opinion

In re Betancourt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Jose M. Betancourt was admitted to practice law *246in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on November 14, 1979 and, at all relevant times, maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

This Court, by decision and order entered July 24, 1997 (232 AD2d 9), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of three years resulting from his neglect of legal matters entrusted to him, making misrepresentations to a client, commingling funds and charging an excessive fee.

On December 11, 1997, respondent was…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. In re McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Matter of Van EmmerikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API