In re Betancourt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Jose M. Betancourt was admitted to practice law *246in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on November 14, 1979 and, at all relevant times, maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
This Court, by decision and order entered July 24, 1997 (232 AD2d 9), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of three years resulting from his neglect of legal matters entrusted to him, making misrepresentations to a client, commingling funds and charging an excessive fee.
On December 11, 1997, respondent was…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4Cited by3 opinions
- In re McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Van EmmerikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025