Legal Opinion

Scott v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1998No. A98A1515PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Harold R. Banke.

One day before the expiration of the statute of limitation, Roy Scott III, filed an action for personal injuries on his own behalf and for Roy Scott IV, and Calvin Scott (collectively “Scott”). Scott’s complaint was not served on Grace Elizabeth Taylor until 32 days later. The trial court dismissed the action finding that Scott was guilty of laches for failing to use due diligence in obtaining service. Scott appeals. Held:

A trial court’s exercise of discretion in determining the diligence of a plaintiff in perfecting service after the five-day safe harbor provision of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Starr v. WimbushCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Bennett v. Matt Gay Chevrolet Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Devoe v. CallisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Jackson v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Cantin v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. ColemonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Zeigler v. HambrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Tate v. Coastal Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Jones v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Magsalin v. ChaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API