State v. Blazio
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVOIS, Judge.
|2The defendant, Adam J. Blazio, appeals his conviction for possession of alprazolam, a violation of LSA-R.S. 40:969(C). On appeal, the defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict, his sentence was excessive, and he was denied due process and a fair trial. The defendant further seeks an errors patent review.1
After thorough consideration of the issues, for the following reasons, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 13, 2005, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney’s Office filed a bill of information charging the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Louisiana Versus Reginald BradleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Chad Tyrone WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Edward Lee CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State of Louisiana v. Elijah James LatiqueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State v. BlazioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.