Legal Opinion

H.R. Miller Co. v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1992No. 31 E.D. Appeal Docket 1990PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

H.R. Miller Company, Inc., challenged the Lancaster Township zoning ordinance, claiming that it excluded a legitimate commercial use, i.e., quarrying. In conjunction *480with its challenge, the Company submitted a proposed curative amendment, suggesting that the deficiency be corrected by amending the zoning map to include a Mineral Recovery District encompassing land owned by the Company. The township board of supervisors dismissed the Company’s challenge and denied its request for curative amendment, but on appeal, the court of common pleas accepted the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. ZONING HEAR. BD. OF WARWICK TP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Fernley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Schuylkill Tp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Greenwood Township v. Kefo, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Township of Exeter v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Caln Nether Co., L.P. v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Piper Group, Inc. v. Bedminster Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. In re the Bartkowski Investment Group, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In Re Appeal of Miller & Son Paving, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API