Lausten v. Lausten
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District' Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Action by Mary K. Lausten against Mads C. Laus-ten. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
On December 18, 1914, this action was commenced by the defendant in error, hereinafter called the plaintiff, in the district court of Washington county against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, for separate maintenance and alimony, and for the custody of the minor children of plaintiff and the defendant. On said day summons was issued in the said cause, returnable on December 28, 1914, requiring the defendant to answbr the petition on or before the 18th day of January, 1915. .This summons was served by delivering a copy to the defendant, in which…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Huston v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- Gaar, Scott & Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Rogers v. McCord-collins Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cushing Gasoline Co. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- American Trailers, Inc. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Braden v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Guaranty State Bank of Tishomingo v. First Nat. Bank of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Davenport v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.