Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank of Quitman v. Brazil

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1977No. 53368PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Been, Presiding Judge.

1. Among those defenses listed in Code § 109A-3 — 305 as available even against a holder in due course, subsection (2) (b) referring to "such . . . illegality of the transaction as renders the obligation of the party a nullity” refers to those defects which render the instrument void, not merely voidable. 2 Anderson Uniform Commercial Code 861, § 3-305:17. Examples of this type of illegality are a gambling debt, the contract being entirely void as against public policy, or a transaction regarding the sale of stolen property. See in the latter connection Middle Ga.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank of Englewood v. Fort Lee Savings & Loan AssociationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Middle Georgia Livestock Sales v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  3. Moore v. Southern Discount CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Marine Midland Trust Co. of Rochester v. BlackburnNew York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. WillisDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1980
  3. Union Planters National Bank v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Dal-Tile Corp. v. Cash N' Go, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Stenger Industries, Inc. v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API