Legal Opinion
Barrese v. Standard Silk Dyeing Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 10, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This writ brings up for review a judgment obtained by the petitioner under the Workmen’s Compensation act (Pamph. L. 1911, p. 136), on account of the death of Brancesco Barrese, who was employed by the Standard Silk Dyeing Company. 10 N. J. Mis. R. 892; 161 Atl. Rep. 653.
The decedent was employed as a dyers’ helper and relief watchman. Among the duties of the decedent as watchman, were the special ones of stopping all “fooling” or skylarking on the premises of the company and of guarding the property of his employer from vandals.
On Saturday, September 20th, 1930, at about…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Hulley v. MoosbruggerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Emerick v. Slavonian Roman Greek Catholic UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919