Legal Opinion

B. Altman & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 22, 1944No. C. D. 868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keefe, Judge:

This case relates to the alleged shortage in two cases of linen goods, it being specifically claimed that duties should not have been assessed on 14 dozen towels 15/22 No. 165 and on 12 dozen towels 20/34 No. 165 invoiced as contained in case B. A. C. 510, for the reason that the foregoing merchandise was either short shipped or stolen and not actually imported into this country.

Counsel for the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a stipulation submitting the case upon the record, it being agreed, however, that the affidavits contained in the official papers should be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. Borgfeldt & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Protest 121188-K of Britam AgenciesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  4. Protest 100211-K of Olavarria & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946
  5. Protest 100291-K of Olavarria & Co.United States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API