Legal Opinion

Boofer v. Lotz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

Should this Court grant Allowance of Appeal to review the Commonwealth Court’s decision because it involves an issue of immediate public importance since the Commonwealth Court decision, if upheld, would require each common pleas court to conduct a hearing prior to permitting the Clerks of Court to comply with the duties imposed upon them by Act 84 even though there is no statutory requirement to hold such a hearing. Should this Court grant Allowance of Appeal…

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harding v. StickmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. George v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Russell v. DonnellyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Buck v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Buck v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API