Legal Opinion

Wright v. Avenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 8, 1929No. 27,433PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This action was commenced against Jacob C. Avenson and Roy Doran as copartners under the name of J. C. Avenson Land Company. Defendant Roy Doran having departed this life before the trial, James E. Doran, as administrator of his estate, was substituted as defendant. He appeals from 'a judgment for plaintiff ordered after trial without a jury.

There is neither settled case nor bill of exceptions. There is only a transcript of the evidence certified by the court reporter. That is not enough to put the evidence or the proceedings at the trial before us for review. The only question which, even in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Yapp v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Gourd v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  3. Thompson v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGovern v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. Doyle v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API