Legal Opinion

Garlington v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1929No. 6 Div. 514PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBricken’, P. J.

But one question is involved in this case. Briefly and succinctly stated, is the exemption provided by section 13 of the license code of the city of Birmingham for the year 1927, p. 89, available to appellant upon the undisputed facts as agreed upon. Said section is as follows: “No license shall be required of any dentist, physician, surgeon or lawyer for the first two years succeeding his admission to the practice of his said profession.”

The undisputed evidence, as shown by the agreed statement of facts, upon which this case was tried, discloses that this appellant was admitted to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Dauphin & LaFayette Streets Railway Co. v. KennerlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SellersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API