Legal Opinion

Norris v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2008No. 43S03-0807-CR-379PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKSON, Justice.

Four years after his guilty plea, conviction, and sentence for child molesting, the defendant sought post-conviction relief on grounds of newly discovered evidence. The post-conviction court granted the State’s motion for summary disposition,1 and the defendant appealed. The Court of *1151Appeals reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing before the post-conviction court. Norris v. State, 881 N.E.2d 691, 692 (Ind.Ct.App.2008). We granted transfer and now hold that a guilty plea may not be challenged in post-conviction proceedings by a claim of newly discovered evidence…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Carter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Alvey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Duane Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Demajio Ellis v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Ocasio v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2014
  5. Komyatti v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API