Legal Opinion

Northern Messenger, Inc. v. Sorensen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1984No. 84-342PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

This appeal arises from the reversal by the district court for Lancaster County of the Nebraska Appeal Tribunal’s affirmance of the determination of the appellant Nebraska Commissioner of Labor that the appellee, Northern Messenger, Inc., is an employer and, as such, is liable under the Employment Security Law for contributions to the Unemployment Compensation Fund. The commissioner and appellant Douglas Molzer, an intervenor before the appeal tribunal, urge that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because of the manner in which the appeal to that court was taken. We agree,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SchroderNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. WHITEHOUSE ENERGY SAVERS, INC. v. HanlonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Nicholson v. City of BellevueNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Public Welfare v. SavilleNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gilmore v. Nebraska Crime Victim's Reparations BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United Laboratories, Inc. v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ex Parte General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Ex Parte General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API