Legal Opinion

Welfare Finance Company v. Corbin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 1955No. 35433PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. “Formerly a brief of evidence was essential to the validity of any motion for new trial. Moxley v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co., 122 Ga. 493 (50 S. E. 339). This rule was modified by the act of 1947, p. 298 (Code, Ann. Supp., § 70-301.1). . . This section was placed in the new rules of procedure to eliminate the useless requirement of incorporating a brief of evidence as a necessary part of the motion when no question as to the evidence adduced upon the trial was germane to the consideration of the error assigned. Where the motion complains of various errors, some requiring the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moxley v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Whitner v. WhitnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Whitner v. WhitnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Smith v. Ætna InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  5. Foster v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Gulick v. MulcahyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. TENDRIFT REALTY COMPANY v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Morrow v. American Tire Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Payne v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API