Legal Opinion

State v. Tolbert

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2017No. 105326PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY J. BOYLE, J.:

{¶ 1} This court granted plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio leave to appeal this case after the trial court vacated defendant-appellee Reginald Tolbert's postrelease control. The state raises two assignments of error for our review:

1. The trial court erred when it granted defendant's motion to vacate postrelease control. To impose valid postrelease control, the language in the sentencing entry may incorporate the advisements given during the sentencing hearing by referencing the postrelease control sections of the Ohio Revised Code and do not need to repeat what was said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Harper, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County2018
  2. 17AP-762Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. State v. CareyOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. State v. FordOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. HargisOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API