Legal Opinion
Elizalde v. Murphy
California Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1905No. L.A. No. 1533PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, C.
Action against the sureties upon an administrator’s bond.
In January, 1894, Ernest Graves was appointed by the superior court of Santa Barbara County administrator of the estate of Marcos A. Elizalde, deceased, and thereupon, and under the direction of the courf, he, as principal, with Meyer Greenberg and A. McAllister as sureties, executed and filed therein a joint and several bond in the sum of twenty thousand dollars for his faithful discharge of the duties of his office. August 2, 1895, upon the petition of the heirs at law of the deceased, representing to the court that Meyer…
2Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Estate of ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Forbes v. Board of Missions of Methodist Episcopal ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Oil Tool Exchange, Inc. v. SchuhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.