Talbott v. Talbott
North Dakota Supreme Court
'Appeal from an order of the District Court of Stutsman County,, Honorable J. A. Coffey, J. A judgment dissolving the relation of husband and wife should never be granted except on the most positive showing, and more than in any other class of cases there should be offered the fullest opportunity for-both parties to be heard.
Read the full summary
'Appeal from an order of the District Court of Stutsman County,, Honorable J. A. Coffey, J. A judgment dissolving the relation of husband and wife should never be granted except on the most positive showing, and more than in any other class of cases there should be offered the fullest opportunity for-both parties to be heard. Bank v. Brandon, 19 N. D. 489; Westbrook v. Rice, 28 N. D. 325. " ' ~ A trial court is vested with a large discretion, which should not be-disturbed except for clear abuse. Robinson v. Cannely, 29 N. D. 291. Mere forgetfulness of a party to an action is not sufficient…
1Opinion of the CourtGrace, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Stutsman county, North Dakota, J. A. Coffey, Judge, denying the motion of the defendant for an order vacating the judgment entered in said action, on July 8, 1919, which order was made and entered on the 19th day of August, 1919. The action was one for divorce, and was based principally on a claim of cruel and inhuman treatment. It was ■commenced by the service of a summons and complaint on the 9th day of April, 1919. Defendant interposed an answer, which admitted that plaintiff was a citizen of the United States and a resident of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Peterson v. FinneganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920