Legal Opinion
Sahr v. Schmidli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action in 1984 to recover damages for injuries sustained when they were assaulted in a bar owned by defendant Baretta’s Lounge, Inc., in the City of Niagara Falls. The complaint alleges that defendants are liable under the Dram Shop Act (General Obligations Law § 11-101) for unlawfully selling alcohol to the assailants, who were allegedly intoxicated at the time of the assault. The complaint further alleges causes of action for negligence and breach of warranty. Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- D'Amico v. ChristieNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cavanaugh v. Knights of Columbus Council 4360Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Senn v. ScudieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Burnell v. La FountainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dollar v. O'HearnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Wilder v. Nickbert Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Koehane v. Lakefront Pier Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Smith v. Blue Mountain Inn, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998