State v. Camp
Supreme Court of Vermont
Information for suffering a bowling alley to be used for play, contrary to the statute of November 3, 1847, after its use had been forbid by the selectmen of the town in which it was situated. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court, which was delivered by
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
This was an information against the respondent for a misdemeanor in keeping a bowling alley in violation of a statute law of the state. Upon trial in the court below, the respondent was found guilty by verdict of the jury. No exceptions were taken upon the trial, but after the verdict was rendered, and during the term, the respondent filed his motion to have the verdict set aside and for a new trial, for the reason that at the trial the prosecuting officer, in support of the prosecution, introduced, without objection, one Hutchinson as a witness, who without being sworn, testified to material…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BabcockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
- Smith v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Burrill v. PhillipsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1812
- Ex parte HillNew York Supreme Court · 1824
- Horton v. HortonNew York Supreme Court · 1824
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MunceyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
- Reynolds v. HassamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
- In re Will of SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914