Legal Opinion
Charboneau v. Turner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 2004No. 03-35845Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Idaho state prisoner Jaimi D. Charboneau appeals pro se the district court’s order granting summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Clicks Billiards, Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.3d 1252, 1257 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.
The prison officials’ contention that Charboneau waived his right to appeal by failing to comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure lacks merit because Charboneau is a pro se litigant. See…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Paul Mitchell v. C. L. SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957