Legal Opinion

Consolidation Coal Co. v. Baldridge

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 14, 1915PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn.

Affirming.

*188Appellee was a brakeman on a coal mine motor train. 'The only other member of the crew was a motorman. While making an outbound trip the motor collided with an empty coal car which it left on the main track when making the inbound trip. Appellee was lying flat on the motor, rather behind the motorman, and was painfully injured in the collision. He sued to recover on account of the gross negligence of the motorman in operating and driving the car, and on the trial the jury returned a verdict for $370. Appellee’s back and leg were bruised but no bones…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Louisville & N. R. R. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Elliott v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. L. & N. R. R. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Major Taylor & Co. v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ShamblenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Jefferson Garage v. SalatinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Buskirk v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Watson Contract Co. v. TrumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API