Legal Opinion
Lowenthal v. Perkins
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phillip R. Rumsey, J.
The defendant Daniel L. Achilles doing business as Dan’s Fuel Service (Achilles) moves for summary judgment to dismiss the eighth and ninth causes of action asserted against him in the complaint.
This is an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff Daniel J. Lowenthal as a result of exposure to fuel oil on or about March 5, 1993. The oil had leaked from a fuel oil tank connected to a heating system at 1014 East Shore Drive, Ithaca, New York (premises).
Lowenthal was a lessee at the premises which is owned by the defendant James R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Domermuth Petroleum Equipment & Maintenance Corp. v. Herzog & Hopkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Town of Guilderland v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- State v. MontayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Wheeler v. National School Bus ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Mittendorf v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Wever Petroleum, Inc. v. Gord's Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Premier National Bank v. Effron Fuel Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1999