Succession of Schulz

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AS A SUSPENSIVE APPEAL

SCHOTT, Chief Judge.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss appellant’s suspensive appeal. The following is the pertinent chronology:

Judgment Signed July 29, 1992

Motion for new trial filed by appellant August 7

August 19 Rehearing denied “ex parte”

October 9 Suspensive Appeal perfected

The record does not reflect that a notice was mailed to appellant or her counsel that her application for rehearing was denied.

C.C.P. art. 2123A(3) provides that the thirty day delay for taking a suspensive appeal commences to run from the date of the mailing of…