United States v. Donahue Industries, Inc., Dba Donahue Printing Company, and Rainier National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWallace, Circuit Judge
I concur in parts I and II of the majority opinion. However, because I do not think Rainier should be penalized for litigating this case, I dissent from part III of the majority opinion.
As the majority explains, supra at 1331, a penalty should not be imposed “in cases where [a] bona fide dispute exists concerning the ... legal effectiveness of the levy.” 26 C.F.R. § 301.6332-l(b)(2) (1989). Elaborating on this standard, the majority adopts the Second Circuit’s conclusion in United States v. Sterling Bank & Trust Co., 494 F.2d 919 (2d Cir.1974), that a bona fide legal dispute exists when there…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Sterling National Bank & Trust Company of New York, and Third-Party v. Charles S. Smith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Bank of CelinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Pittsburgh National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Thomas Jerry Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.