Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Uriel Soria-Ocampo

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 13, 2018No. 18-1236; 18-1315PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Raphael Campuzano-Benitez and Uriel Soria-Ocampo pleaded guilty for their roles as middlemen in a cocaine deal. The formal charge was a conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Both men appeal their sentences. They argue that the district court erred on two sentencing guideline issues: the amount of cocaine the court attributed to them and their relative roles in the conspiracy. They also argue that the district court erred by allowing a witness to consult with his attorney during his testimony in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. Panaigua-VerdugoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States ex rel. Welch v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Scott CarnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Roberto Guzman-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Xuan TamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Cory FreyermuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Cory FreyermuthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API