Chaney v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.
A criminal justice system, by its very nature, frequently involves the delicate balancing of competing interests. A society dedicated to human liberty must be ever vigilant that a suspect never be compelled to incriminate himself. That same society, legitimately concerned with protecting itself from its predators, must also be sensitive to the value of an admission or confession, properly obtained, as sometimes indispensable evidence of guilt. But for the confession in the case at bar, a brutal sexual assault and strangulation of a ten-year-old girl might have gone forever unredressed.
On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Kennedy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.