Williams v. Lee
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
It is suggested that we erred in our former opinion in this case, and several reasons are assigned why our decision is erroneous. We desire to correct the statement in the opinion wherein we inadvertently said that the inquiry was whether the superintendent of the county or “trustees of the district,” etc., when we should have said “county school hoard,” instead of trustees.
The authorities cited by appellant are not controlling here, because, even though the districts might be consolidated, or new territory added to a district, it could not be done by the action alone of the authorities of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- School District No. 28 v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Yeager v. MerrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
- Williams v. LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1923