Legal Opinion

Peck v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the payment of claims made by the relator against' the county of Kent. The issues are presented by demurrer, so that the facts stand admitted.

•The relator was sheriff of the county of Kent for the four years immediately preceding the first day of January, 1881. After his retirement from the office he presented to the board of supervisors two claims against the county, which were rejected by the board, and which are now the subject of this proceeding.

The first claim is for the board of one Babcock, a night watchman at the jail, from September 1,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Mixer v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Endriss v. County of ChippewaMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Clark v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Macdonald v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLeod v. State Board of CanvassersMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Brown v. StewartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Kosiba v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cleary v. County of EddyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API