People v. Smith
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frederic S. Berman, J.
If, after having heard a case, a Grand Jury votes a no true bill, yet sua sponte votes to reconsider the case, and eventually returns an indictment, is the indictment invalid because *78the People, prior to such reconsideration, failed to obtain judicial leave to re-present the case under CPL 190.75 (1)?
On or about June 15, 1993, a Grand Jury voted an indictment charging the defendant, Harold Smith, with one count of grand larceny in the fourth degree under Penal Law § 155.30 (5).
Subsequently, in writing, the defendant moved for the dismissal of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. CadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. GrohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. SteckerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MontanezNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. WesleyNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996