Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frederic S. Berman, J.

If, after having heard a case, a Grand Jury votes a no true bill, yet sua sponte votes to reconsider the case, and eventually returns an indictment, is the indictment invalid because *78the People, prior to such reconsideration, failed to obtain judicial leave to re-present the case under CPL 190.75 (1)?

On or about June 15, 1993, a Grand Jury voted an indictment charging the defendant, Harold Smith, with one count of grand larceny in the fourth degree under Penal Law § 155.30 (5).

Subsequently, in writing, the defendant moved for the dismissal of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. CadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. GrohAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. SteckerNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MontanezNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. People v. WesleyNew York Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. FosterNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API