Legal Opinion
State v. Whitman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2009No. 09-CA-03PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gwin, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the March 19, 2009 judgment entry of the Holmes County Municipal Court granting defendant-appellee Scott E. Whitman’s motion to suppress evidence.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE
{¶ 2} On December 20, 2008, at 1:11 a.m., Deputy Tim Stryker observed appellee’s car drift left of center twice. Deputy Stryker initiated a traffic stop. He then approached appellee’s vehicle and informed him of the reason for the stop, at which time appellee informed him that the reason he had crossed over the line was that he was “looking at the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BattyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. ChambersOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. ElliotOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. HollinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. IslesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.