Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. City Vending of Muskogee, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1992No. 65602Published

1Concurring in the judgmentOp Ala, Chief Justice

The court affirms today the trial court’s judgment which permanently enjoins the wholesaler, City Vending, from selling cigarettes within the State without a license. While I do not accede to the court’s pronouncement, I concur insofar as the court declares that the Oklahoma Tax Commission’s [Commission] order, which assessed a cigarette excise tax against the wholesaler and revoked its license, is not facially void for want of subject matter *103jurisdiction. I am writing separately (a) to give prominence to that part of the court’s opinion which discusses the consequences of our Dow Jones’1…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Tafflin v. LevittSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API