Legal Opinion

Reiff v. Armour & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1914No. 11272PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Yakey, J., entered January 2, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff and one Hansen were copartners in a butcher business, and as such had established a credit with defendant and others. Defaulting in their payments, defendant, for itself and as the assignee of others, took a judgment against the firm of Reiff & Hansen. At and prior to the time the debts were incurred, plaintiff owned certain real property in the city of Spokane. This property was carried into the property statements of the firm by Hansen, who attended to the details of the business, and it is not denied that it was an inducing cause for the credit. The judgment appearing as an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flood v. LibbyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bull v. . CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Cook v. AlleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Chehalis County BankWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Clark v. LynchNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. German-American State Bank v. GodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bank of Brimson v. GrahamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Consumers Time Credit, Inc. v. Remark Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Pefly v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Northern Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KneisleyWashington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API