Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1973No. 7329SC94Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Petitioner assigns as error the instructions of the trial judge to the jury upon the measure of damages applicable to the condemnation of an easement for transmission lines. Defendant argues that the trial judge, in effect, instructed the jury to arrive at its determination of damages as though the fee title to the right-of-way was being condemned. Petitioner cites Power Co. v. Rogers, 271 N.C. 318, 156 S.E. 2d 244.

In our opinion the error in Power Co. v. Rogers is not present in the case before us. We agree with petitioner that the instructions given by the trial court would…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. CarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Duke Power Company v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API