AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentCobb, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent.
Before it decided Hickox v. Stover, 551 So.2d 259 (Ala.1989), in which it adopted the justifiable-reliance standard, this Court had applied a reasonable-reliance standard in regard to a fraud claim. However, several exceptions existed at that time to the reasonable-reliance standard. For example, an illiterate party to a contract could allege fraud and overcome the other party’s reliance on the terms of a written contract. Paysant v. Ware, 1 Ala. 160 (1840). Another exception existed based on the relationship between the parties. In Southern Building & Loan Ass’n v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Arkel Land Co. v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.