Legal Opinion · Dissent

AmerUs Life Insurance Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 19, 2008No. 1061535Published

1DissentCobb, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

Before it decided Hickox v. Stover, 551 So.2d 259 (Ala.1989), in which it adopted the justifiable-reliance standard, this Court had applied a reasonable-reliance standard in regard to a fraud claim. However, several exceptions existed at that time to the reasonable-reliance standard. For example, an illiterate party to a contract could allege fraud and overcome the other party’s reliance on the terms of a written contract. Paysant v. Ware, 1 Ala. 160 (1840). Another exception existed based on the relationship between the parties. In Southern Building & Loan Ass’n v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Hickox v. StoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Potter v. First Real Estate Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. DinsmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Arkel Land Co. v. CagleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API