City of Birmingham v. Williams
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Questions certified by Court of Appeals.
Questions certified by the Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court, under Code 1923, § 7322.
Questions answered.
Answering questions certified in 155 Sot 878.
June 5, 1934.
To the Honorable Supreme Court of Alabama,
Sirs: It seems to us that the violation of the terms of a penal city ordinance is an “offense” within the meaning of section 9 of the Constitution of 1901. 16 C. J. 282. And that a trial therefor before a competent tribunal constitutes “jeopardy of * * * limb.”
And that to allow the city to appeal from a judgment of acquittal rendered on such trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hurst v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Portland v. EricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Costello v. FeaginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Noland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Donahey v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
- Birmingham v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Birmingham v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Donahey v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.