Legal Opinion

Krug v. Carlson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2000No. 990262, 990303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Patrick Krug appealed from an amended judgment ordering him to reimburse Jody Carlson for past expenses for their child. Concluding the trial court did not err in using the child support guidelines to compute a reasonable amount of reimbursement, we affirm.

[¶ 2] Patrick Krug and Jody Carlson were married on February 14, 1997. Within weeks, the parties separated and Carlson moved to Minnesotá to live with her ex-husband. Carlson was pregnant at the time of the marriage.

[¶ 3] Krug commenced a divorce action in May 1997. The parties entered into a stipulation agreeing to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. AckermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Perala v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mougey v. SalzwedelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hagel v. HagelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lukenbill v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wilson v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. North Dakota Dep't of Human Services v. BrendenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API