Legal Opinion
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Morton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 13, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-2188PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CORCORAN, District Judge.
The plaintiff is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The defendants are (1) the Secretary of the Interior; (2) the Director, National Park Service; (3) the National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc., and (4) Thomas R. Ottenstein. Defendants (1) and (2) are hereinafter referred to as the “federal defendants” and defendants (3) and (4) as the “private defendants.”
The plaintiff seeks both declaratory and injunctive relief in a five-count complaint.
The Court’s jurisdiction is premised upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332, 1361, 2201-2202; 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joseph v. AdamsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1978
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1980
- Prince George's County, Maryland v. HollowayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Paulina Lake Historic Cabin Owners Ass'n v. U.S.D.A. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1983
- Friends of the River v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.