Legal Opinion

Forgan v. Gordon Motor Finance Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1932No. 21378. Appellate Court reversed; circuit court affirmedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

An action in replevin and trover was instituted in the circuit court of Cook county to determine the right of possession of a certain Cord automobile. Upon a hearing without a jury the trial court found plaintiff in error, the Gordon Motor Finance Company, (herein designated as the Gordon Company,) not guilty and ordered a writ of retorno habendo issued in its favor. Thereafter the defendants in error, being nine trustees of the Commercial Credit Trust, (herein referred to as the Credit Trust,) perfected an appeal to the Appellate Court for the First District, and a judgment was there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sherer-Gillett Co. v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Schaefer v. Washington Safety Deposit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Reynolds v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Savings Bank v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  2. Frank v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Jackson v. GoodeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Associates Discount Corporation v. BogardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Milhahn v. SappAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API