Legal Opinion

Medland v. Connell

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1898No. 8510PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Ambbose, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNobval, J.

This suit was to foreclose two certificates of tax sales, one on the east half of lot 6, in G-riffm & Smith’s Addition to the city of Omaha, and the other covering the west half of the same lot. Plaintiff purchased the property at private sale on February 1, 1894, for taxes levied by the city of Omaha for the year 1890. He has paid prior and subsequent taxes and special assessments, and for the several amounts so paid he seeks to enforce a lien. The decree was for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

There were such irregularities in the proceedings leading up to the tax sales as to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gran v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Leavitt v. BellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Adams v. OsgoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Pettit v. BlackNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  5. McGavock v. PollackNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grant v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Power v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Moffitt v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Xerox Corp. v. KarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wakeley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API